用 https://github.com/samuraisam/pyapns 的飘过。是看到instagram用的这个，应该比较靠谱。到还没有压力测过。

@Tonny 其实“草莓街”这个亮了！

@Tonny 看到新版界面，突然觉得加个“给对方点歌”可能比较有意思。有时候，没有什么比得上一首歌能表达的情绪。

来，再爆一个

大赞一个，继续coding

顶啊！爆啊！

@lek 回成都后一盘dota都还没打过＝。＝
等上线后休闲下。

ruby on rails很适合初学者，莫非初学者就应该去学老旧生硬的东西？

我和我骄傲的倔强，我在风中大声地唱～

怎么不考虑air,新版的15寸马上就出了。SSD很给力的啊。

顶一下此贴以怀念一下在杭州的生活

@victor 小恩爱确实和情侣空间有本质的区别。
其实是不是第一并不重要，任何一个细微的创意，都可以说成是世界第1。还是得看产品本身做得怎么样，拼的是执行力。
另外这也是货真价实的草根创业者，能得到风投和媒体的关注，同样也實屬不易。难能可贵的是向世界宣称自己存在的勇气和自信！

支持一下，@Tonny你们决定换ror啦？

可以试试pypy.org
mailing list原文

Summary: Pypy 1.7 is almost twice as fast as cpython 2.7 on the
tornado HTTPServer benchmark, and three times as fast on the
template-rendering benchmark. Pypy used about three times as much
memory in both cases, but usage was stable over time (i.e. it's not
"leaking" like pypy 1.6 did).

Details: Tested on an "m1.large" EC2 instance running ubuntu 10.04
and the 64-bit binary releases of pypy (and cpython 2.7 from
https://launchpad.net/~fkrull/+archive/deadsnakes). Large instances
have two cores so the ab client wasn't competing for cpu cycles with
the python process.

ubuntu@ip-10-114-147-85:~/tornado$ /usr/bin/time python2.6
demos/benchmark/benchmark.py --quiet --num_runs=5|grep "Requests per
second"
Requests per second: 2010.39 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 2010.70 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 2000.56 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 2007.37 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 1983.27 [#/sec] (mean)
34.19user 7.29system 0:37.75elapsed 109%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
59040maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+22404minor)pagefaults 0swaps

ubuntu@ip-10-114-147-85:~/tornado$ /usr/bin/time python2.7
demos/benchmark/benchmark.py --quiet --num_runs=5|grep "Requests per
second"
Requests per second: 2127.01 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 2122.64 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 2219.56 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 2209.65 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 2204.07 [#/sec] (mean)
30.62user 6.76system 0:34.83elapsed 107%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
60480maxresident)k
0inputs+8outputs (1major+20898minor)pagefaults 0swaps

ubuntu@ip-10-114-147-85:~/tornado$ /usr/bin/time ~/pypy-1.6/bin/pypy
demos/benchmark/benchmark.py --quiet --num_runs=5|grep "Requests per
second"
Requests per second: 2436.49 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 3289.71 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 3469.36 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 3453.05 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 3373.15 [#/sec] (mean)
22.06user 6.76system 0:25.76elapsed 111%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
328208maxresident)k
0inputs+3328outputs (0major+89216minor)pagefaults 0swaps

ubuntu@ip-10-114-147-85:~/tornado$ /usr/bin/time ~/pypy-1.7/bin/pypy
demos/benchmark/benchmark.py --quiet --num_runs=5|grep "Requests per
second"
Requests per second: 2673.48 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 4410.94 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 4155.42 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 4164.85 [#/sec] (mean)
Requests per second: 4626.81 [#/sec] (mean)
17.15user 6.95system 0:21.08elapsed 114%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
186576maxresident)k
0inputs+2680outputs (0major+59250minor)pagefaults 0swaps

ubuntu@ip-10-114-147-85:~/tornado$ /usr/bin/time python2.7
demos/benchmark/template_benchmark.py --num=1000
38.003 ms per iteration
37.56user 0.54system 0:38.14elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 46672maxresident)k
0inputs+136outputs (0major+119479minor)pagefaults 0swaps

ubuntu@ip-10-114-147-85:~/tornado$ /usr/bin/time ~/pypy-1.7/bin/pypy
demos/benchmark/template_benchmark.py --num=1000
12.899 ms per iteration
13.08user 0.03system 0:13.11elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
153296maxresident)k
0inputs+144outputs (0major+14267minor)pagefaults 0swaps

最老火的还有那个导航，原来3.0的时候，左边的导航那么好用的，每个对象有哪些方法哪些属性一目了然。后来4.0就搞成现在这样子，搜索和树状视图不能对应起来。怀疑xcode文档的产品经理根本就不懂开发者。

给你的员工多发几千块钱的薪水，他会觉得你更尊重程序员的劳动成果。
经济上真的做得到的话，先拿自己工资给自己买正版，然后把买正版的钱发给员工，让员工自己决定。